Remicade® infliximab

Find a Specialist | Contact Us | For Healthcare Professionals

REMICADE and Plaque Psoriasis
REMICADE and Crohn's Disease
REMICADE and Ankylosing Spondylitis REMICADE and Ulcerative Colitis
Specialist Locator Enrollment
Resources for Healthcare Professionals
Full Prescribing Information

 

ACCENT II Clinical Trial Overview

ACCENT II Study Background

The FDA approval of REMICADE as maintenance therapy for fistulizing disease was based on data from the ACCENT II trial. ACCENT II stands for "A Crohn's disease Clinical trial Evaluating infliximab in a New Long term Treatment regimen in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease."

This was a multicenter, randomized, international trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of long-term maintenance therapy with REMICADE in 296 patients with fistulizing CD. Patients, not previously treated with REMICADE, experiencing a single or multiple draining enterocutaneous fistulas of at least 3 months duration were enrolled.1,2

All patients received an initial induction regimen of REMICADE 5 mg/kg at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. At Week 14, patients were randomized based on clinical response, defined as a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the number of draining fistulas at both Weeks 10 and 14, to receive maintenance dosing with either REMICADE 5 mg/kg or placebo every 8 weeks. Patients who did not respond to the initial 3-dose induction regimen were randomized separately from these patients. Beginning at Week 22, patients who responded to treatment but then lost their clinical benefit were eligible to cross over to maintenance treatment with REMICADE 5 mg/kg, if receiving placebo, or to REMICADE 10 mg/kg, if receiving REMICADE 5 mg/kg. Concomitant Crohn’s disease medications were maintained at stable doses. The primary endpoint of the trial was the time from randomization until loss of response; analysis only included the Week 14 responders. Secondary endpoints included the effectiveness of REMICADE in inducing complete fistula response (no draining fistulas), duration of fistula response, and health-related resource consumption.

ACCENT II Study Findings
Among the randomized patients (273 of the 296 initially enrolled), 87% had perianal fistulas and 14% had abdominal fistulas. Eight percent also had rectovaginal fistulas. Greater than 90% of the patients had received previous immunosuppressive and antibiotic therapy.1

At Week 14, 65% (177/273) of patients were in fistula response. Patients randomized to REMICADE maintenance had a longer time to loss of fistula response compared to the placebo maintenance group (>40 weeks vs. 14 weeks, respectively). At Week 54, 38% (33/87) of REMICADE-treated patients had no draining fistulas compared with 22% (20/90) of placebo-treated patients (p = 0.02). Compared to placebo maintenance, patients on REMICADE maintenance had a trend toward fewer hospitalizations and surgeries/procedures at Week 54. A significant improvement in median IBDQ scores was also noted in the REMICADE maintenance group compared to the placebo maintenance group.

Patients who achieved a fistula response and subsequently lost response were eligible to receive REMICADE maintenance therapy at a dose that was 5 mg/kg higher than the dose to which they were randomized. Of the placebo maintenance patients, 66% (25/38) responded to 5 mg/kg REMICADE, and 57% (12/21) of REMICADE maintenance patients responded to 10 mg/kg.1

Patients who achieved a fistula response and subsequently lost response were eligible to receive REMICADE maintenance therapy at a dose that was 5 mg/kg higher than the dose to which they were randomized. Of the placebo maintenance patients, 66% (25/38) responded to 5 mg/kg REMICADE, and 57% (12/21) of REMICADE maintenance patients responded to 10 mg/kg.1

Patients who had not achieved a response by Week 14 were unlikely to respond to additional doses of REMICADE.1

References:

  1. REMICADE® (infliximab) prescribing information.
  2. Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al. Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:876-885.